ADAPTIVE PROPERTIES OF BONE
a review
University of Wisconsin
Phenomenology
The
relationship between the mass and form of a bone to the forces applied to it
was appreciated by Galileo (4.1.1), who is credited with being the first to
understand the balance of forces in beam bending and with applying this
understanding to the mechanical analysis of bone. Julius Wolff (4.1.2)
published his seminal 1892 monograph on bone remodeling; the observation that
bone is reshaped in response to the forces acting on it is presently referred
to as Wolff's law. Many relevant observations regarding the phenomenology of
bone remodeling have been compiled and analyzed by Frost (4.1.3,4.1.4). Salient
points are as follows:
1. Remodelling is triggered not by principal stress but by 'flexure".
2.
Repetitive dynamic loads on bone trigger remodelling; static loads do not.
3.
Dynamic flexure causes all affected bone surfaces to drift towards the
concavity which arises during the act of dynamic flexure.
These rules are essentially qualitative and they do not deal with underlying causes. A critique of these ideas has been presented by Currey (4). Additional aspects
of bone remodeling may be found in the clinical literature. For example, after
complete removal of a metacarpal and its replacement with graft consisting of a
strut of tibial bone, the graft becomes remodelled to resemble a real
metacarpal; the graft continues to function after 52 years (4.1.5). In the
standards of the Swiss Association for Internal Fixation it is pointed out that
severe osteoporosis can result from the use of two bone plates in the same
region as a result of the greatly reduced stress in the bone (4.1.6). Pauwels
(4.1.7) suggested that as a result of bending stresses the medial and lateral
aspects of the femur should be stiffer and stronger than the anterior and
posterior aspects. Such a difference has actually been observed (4.1.8). Large
cyclic stress causes more resorption than large static stress (4.1.9).
Immobilization of humans causes loss of bone and excretion of calcium and
phosphorus (4.1.10). Long spaceflights under zero gravity also cause loss of
bone (4.1.11,4.1.12); hypergravity induced by centrifugation strengthens the
bones of rats (4.1.13,4.1.14). Studies of stress-induced remodeling of living
bone have been performed
in
vitro
(4.1.15). Recently,
in
vivo
studies in pigs (4.1.16) were conducted. In this study, strains were directly
measured by strain gages before and after remodelling. Remodelling was induced
by removing part of the pigs' ulna so that the radius bore all the load.
Initially, the peak strain in the ulna approximately doubled. New bone was
added until, after three months, the peak strain was about the same as on the
normal leg bones.
In vivo
experiments conducted in sheep (4.1.17) have disclosed similar results. It is
of interest to compare the response time noted in the above experiments with
the rate of bone turnover in healthy humans. The life expectancy of an
individual osteon in a normal 45 year old man is 15 years and it will have
taken 100 days to produce it (4.1.18, 4.1.19).
Remodelling of Haversian bone seems to influence the quantity of bone but not its quality, i.e. Young's modulus, tensile strength, and composition(4.1.20). However the
initial remodelling of primary bone to produce Haversian bone results in a
reduction in strength (4). As for the influence of the rate of loading on bone
remodelling, there is good evidence to suggest that intermittent deformation
can produce a marked adaptive response in bone, whereas static deformation has
little effect (4.1.16). Experiments (4.1.21) upon rabbit tibiae bear this out.
In the dental field, by contrast, it is accepted that static forces of long
duration move teeth in the jawbone. In this connection, (4.1.22) the direction
(as well as the type) of stresses acting on the bone tissue should also be
considered. Currey (4) points out that the response of different bones in the
same skeleton to mechanical loads must differ, otherwise lightly loaded bones
such as the top of the human skull, or the auditory ossicles, would be resorbed.
Failure
of bone remodeling to occur normally in certain disease states is of interest:
for example, micropetrotic bone contains few if any viable osteocytes and
usually contains a much larger number of microscopic cracks than adjacent
living bone (4.1.23). This suggests that the osteocytes play a role in
detecting and repairing the damage. In senile osteoporosis, bone tissue is
removed by the body, often to such an extent that fractures occur during normal
activities. Osteoporosis may be referred to as a remodelling error (4.1.4).
Some
theoretical work, notably by Cowin and others (4.1.24), has dealt with the
problem of formulating Wolff's law in a quantitative fashion. In this theory,
constitutive equations are developed, which predict the remodelling response to
a given stress. Stability considerations are invoked to obtain some constraints
on the parameters in the constitutive equation.
4.2
Feedback mechanisms
Bone remodeling appears to be governed by a feedback system in which the bone
cells sense the state of strain in the bone matrix around them and either add
or remove bone as needed to maintain the strain within normal limits. The
process or processes by which the cells are able to sense the strain and the
important aspects of the strain field are presently unknown. Bassett and Becker
(4.2.1) reported that bone is piezoelectric, i.e. that it generates electric
fields in response to mechanical stress; they advanced the hypothesis that the
piezoelectric effect is the part of the feedback loop by which the cells sense
the strain field. This hypothesis obtained support from observations of
osteogenesis in response to externally applied electric fields of the same
order of magnitude as those generated naturally by stress via the piezoelectric
effect. The study of bone bioelectricity has received impetus from observations
that externally applied electric or electromagnetic fields stimulate bone
growth (4.2.2). The electrical hypothesis, while favored by many, has not been
proven. Indeed, other investigators have advanced competing hypotheses which
involve other mechanisms by which the cells are informed of the state of stress
around them.
For
example, inhomogeneous deformation at the lamellae may impinge on osteocyte
processes and thus trigger the osteocytes to initiate bone formation or
remodelling (4.2.3). Motion at the cement lines was observed and it was
suggested that such motion could act as a passive mechanism by which bone's
symmetry axes may become aligned to the direction of time averaged principal
stresses (2.9.9). Stress on bone may induce flow of fluid in channels, e.g.
canaliculi, and such flow could play a role in the nutrition and waste
elimination of osteocytes, which may be significant in bone remodeling (4.2.4).
In a related vein, theoretical arguments have been presented in support of the
hypothesis that bone cells are directly sensitive to hydrostatic pressure
transmitted to them from the bone matrix via the tissue fluid (4.2.5). Although
no experimental test of this direct pressure hypothesis has been published, we
observe with interest that direct hydrostatic pressure has recently been
observed to alter the swimming behavior of paramecia, possibly by means of
action upon the cell membrane (4.2.6). Otter and Salman found that a
hydrostatic pressure of 68 atm abolishes the reversing of direction of
swimming, 170 atm stops swimming, and 400-500 atm irreversibly damages the
cell. We observe that 100 atm corresponds to 1400 psi stress, or in bone, a
strain of 0.07% which is in the normal range of bone strain. 500 atm
corresponds to 7000 psi or a strain of 0.35%, well above the normal range of
bone strain. Stress in bone also results in temperature differences between
osteons (4.2.7); the cells may be sensitive to sudden temperature changes
during human activity. A mechanochemical hypothesis has been advanced, in which
the solubility of calcium may be affected by stress in the bone matrix (4.2.8).
Strain energy in bone might also influence the energetics of bone mineral
nucleation (4.2.9). It has also been suggested that remodelling may be
initiated in response to microcracks generated by mechanical fatigue of bone
(4.2.10). In summary, many hypotheses have been proposed for the mechanism by
which appropriate cells sense the state of strain in bone, but little or no
experimental evidence is available to discriminate among them.
4.3 Cellular and biochemical aspects of bone remodelling
The
adaptive response of bone to mechanical stimuli is mediated by living cells. A
great deal is known concerning bone cell function and its control by ionic and
hormonal factors, but little is known concerning the effect of mechanical
strain in bone upon the biochemistry of its cells. Rasmussen and Bordier
(4.3.1) have presented an extensive review of studies of bone cell physiology.
Recently, the biochemical consequences of electrical stimulation of bone have
been reported (4.3.2). Biochemical steps associated with cell activation are
as yet poorly understood, but ion fluxes appear to play a role (4.3.3). Cyclic
nucleotides mediate the effects of extracellular signals(4.3.4) and
prostaglandins modulate them (4.3.4). Prostaglandin E
2
has been hypothesized to mediate bone resorption in trauma, malignancy, and
periodontal disease. This prostaglandin, as well as the cellular constituents
cyclic AMP and cyclic GMP, has been found in association with regions of bone
stimulated electrically (4.3.2).
References
1. Hancox, N.M., Biology of Bone, Cambridge University Press, 1972.
2. Evans, F.G., The mechanical properties of bone, Thomas, Springfield, Ill, 1973.
3. Gordon, J. E. Structures, Penguin (1983)
4. Currey, J., The mechanical adaptations of bones, Princeton University Press, 1984.
5. Reilly, D.T. and Burstein, A. H., The mechanical properties of cortical bone, J. Bone
Jnt. Surg., 56A, 1001-1022, 1974.
6. Currey, J.D., The mechanical properties of bone, Clin. Orthop. Rel. Res., 73, 210-231,
1970.
7. Phillips, R. W., Science of dental materials, W. B. Saunders, 1973.
4.1.1.
Galilei, G., Discorsi
E. Dimostrazioni Matematiche intorna a due nuove Scienze
,
pp.
158-172, 1638, Translated by H. Crew and A. deSalvio, Macmillan, NY,
pp.
118-134, 1914.
4.1.2.
Wolff,
J.,
Das
Gesetz der Transformation der Knochen
,
Hirschwald, Berlin, 1892.
4.1.3.
Frost,
H. M.,
Bone
remodelling and its relation to metabolic bone diseases
,
C.
Thomas, Springfield, IL, 1973.
4.1.4. Frost,
H. M.,
Bone
modelling and skeletal modelling errors
,
C. Thomas,
Springfield,
IL, 1973.
4.1.5.
Nathan,
P.A. and Fowler, A., Remodeling of a metacarpal bone graft in a child,
J.
Bone Jnt. Surg
.,
58A,719-722, 1976.
4.1.6.
Muller,
M.E., Allgouer, M., Willeneger, H.,
Manual
of Internal Fixation -
Technique
Recommended by the AO Group,
Springer Verlag, 1970.
4.1.7.
Pauwels,
F., Die Bedeutung des Bauprinzipien des Stütz und Bewegensapparatens
für die
Beanspruchung
der Rohrenknochen,
Z.
für Anat. und Entwicklungsgesch
,
114:129-166,
1948.
4.1.8.
Amtmann,
E., The distribution of the breaking strength in the femur,
J.
Biomech.
1, 271-277, 1968.
4.1.9.
Seirig,
A. and Kempko, W, Behavior of
in
vivo
bone under cyclic loading,
J.
Biomech.
, 2, 455-461, 1969.
4.1.10.
Dietrick,
J.E., Whedon, G., Shorr, E., Effects of immobilization upon various
metabolic
and physiological functions of bone,
Am.
Jnl. Med.
4, 3-36, 1948.
4.1.11. Mack,
P.B., La Chance, P.L., Effects of recumbency and space flight on bone density,
Am.
J. Clin. Nutrition
,
20,194-205, 1967.
4.1.12. Morey,
E. R., and Baylink, D. K., Inhibition of bone formation during space flight,
Science,
201, 1138-1141, 1978.
4.1.13. Wunder,
C.C., Briney, S.R., Skangstad, C.A., Growth of mouse femurs during chronic
centrifugation,
Nature,
188, 151-152, 1960.
4.1.14. Wunder,
C.C., Cook, R.M., Welch, R.C., Glade, R., Fleming, B.P., Femur bending
properties
as influenced by gravity: I. ultimate load and moment for 3-G rats,
Aviat.
Space Environ. Med.
48, 339-346, 1977.
4.1.15. Glucksmann,
A., Studies of bone mechanics in vitro I-Influence of pressure on
orientation
of structure,
Anat.
Rec
.,
72, 97-115,1938.
4.1.16. Goodship,
A.E. , Lanyon, L.E., McFie, M., Functional adaptation of bone to increased
stress,
J.
Bone Jnt. Surg.
,
61A, 539-546, 1979.
4.1.17. Hall,
B. K.,
Developmental
and cellular skeletal biology
,
Academic Press, N.Y., 1978.
4.1.18. Sumner-Smith,
G.,
Bone
in clinical orthopaedics
,
W. B. Saunders, 1982.
4.1.19. Lanyon,
L. E., Magee, P. T., and Bagott, D. G., The relationship of the functional
stress
and strain to the process of bone remodelling: an experimental study on the
sheep
radius,
J.
Biomech.
12, 593-600, 1979.
4.1.20. Woo,
S. L. Y., Kuei, S. C., Amiel, D., Gomez, M. A., Hayes, W. C., White, F. C., and
Akeson,
W. H., The effect of prolonged physical training on the properties of long bone:
a
study of Wolff's law,
J.
Bone Jnt. Surg.
,
63A, 780-787, 1981.
4.1.21. Liskova,
M. and Hert, J., Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli, part 2, periosteal
and
endosteal
reaction of the tibial diaphysis in rabbit to intermittent loading,
Folia
Morphologica
19, 310-317, 1971.
4.1.22. Wright,
K.W.J. and Yettram, A.L., An analytical investigation into possible
mechanical
causes of bone remodelling,
J.
Biomed. Eng
.,
(England) 1, 41-49, 1979.
4.1.23. Frost,
H. M., Osteocyte death in vivo,
J.
Bone Jnt. Surg.
,
42A, 138-143, 1960.
4.1.24.
Cowin,
S. C. and Hegedus, D. H., Bone Remodeling I: Theory of adaptive elasticity,
Journal
of Elasticity
,
6, 313-326, 1976.
Top